Showing posts with label South Carolina. Show all posts
Showing posts with label South Carolina. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

SCE&G, CEZ, Ice, The Sun

 Unrattled:
South Carolina Electric and Gas Co. said it expects to have a federal license by January to operate two new nuclear reactors it wants to build in Fairfield County.
The State newspaper reported SCE&G received a letter Wednesday from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission saying the utility's application is complete and a final safety report should be ready in September.
The NRC then would have four months to hold a public hearing and issue the licenses for the nearly $10 billion project.
SCE&G provides a little more detail about the two reactors planned at V.C. Summer:
In the letter, the NRC staff concluded that SCE&G’s application for a combined operating license is complete. The revised schedule supports the issuance of the Final Safety Evaluation Report (FSER) in September 2011. As the NRC letter stated “The objective for completion of the mandatory hearing, including issuance of a final Commission decision, should be no later than four months from the issuance of the later of the FSER or Final Environmental Impact Statement for the COL.”
And makes it clear that this fits the schedule originally set for the project. The first new unit should be begin operation in 2016 and the second in 2019.
SCE&G also provides a pdf of the NRC letter outlining its schedule if you want to dig deeper into the details.
---
Rattled:
Panicky investors, worried about euro-zone debt, global economic gloominess and plunging stock markets, may have let recent antinuclear sentiment and the hunt for havens get the best of them.
Wouldn’t be the first time, would it?
Analysts say shares in Czech-based power company CEZ AS, central Europe's biggest producer of nuclear power, have fallen too much amid the recent German-led backlash against atomic energy. They predict the stock price will recover later this year as the furor over nuclear energy dies down and the Europe Union discusses exemptions to regulations covering carbon-dioxide emissions.
Die down or no, CEZ, of which the Czech government is a majority owner, never changed course:
"Some international investors may not pay attention to [the] Czechs still supporting nuclear power. These investors might think Germans are against nuclear, so Europe will be against it, too," said Teresa Schinwald, an analyst at Raiffeisen in Vienna who has a "buy" recommendation and target price of 1,050 Czech Koruna ($60.93) on CEZ. "It seems like a perception problem rather than a practical one."
If I were an expert on the stock market, well, I’d probably be panicking. But not about CEZ.
---
We know that the earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan in March were powerful – leaving Fukushima Daiichi aside for a moment, they caused a loss of life and property that was so large it was difficult to grasp. On this side of the Pacific, some marinas were rocked by the tsunami, but no serious damage occurred.
Looking east made sense at the time, but others were looking south:
To sum up the dynamics of the event: An earthquake off the coast of Japan caused massive waves to explode out from its epicenter. Swells of water swarmed toward an ice shelf in Antarctica, 8,000 miles (13,600 kilometers) away, and about 18 hours after the earthquake occurred, those waves broke off several chunks of ice that together equaled about two times the surface area of Manhattan. According to historical records, this particular piece of ice hadn't budged in at least 46 years before the tsunami came along.
This is significant because scientists had no evidence that a tsunami could do this – snap off pieces of the ice shelf – and this instance has been extensively documented (the site has a video of the icebergs being formed, for starters). This can lead to new intelligence about ice shelf stability.
I’m not sure that this episode causes problems itself – the article doesn’t say so – but I’d guess ships in the southern hemisphere will need to know the location of a Manhattan-sized block of ice – assuming it can be carried by waves – so they can avoid it.
---
Here comes the sun:
Storms are brewing about 93 million miles (150 million kilometers) away, and if one of them reaches Earth, it could knock out communications, scramble GPS, and leave thousands without power for weeks to months.
But go about your business in an orderly way.
This is what is happening:
The tempest is what's known as a solar storm, a flurry of charged particles that erupts from the sun. Under the right conditions, solar storms can create extra electrical currents in Earth's magnetosphere—the region around the planet controlled by our magnetic field.
The electrical power grid is particularly vulnerable to these extra currents, which can infiltrate high-voltage transmission lines, causing transformers to overheat and possibly burn out.
Now, before we prepare for months in the dark:
"Geomagnetic storms are low-probability, high-impact events," Lordan said. "When assessing the risk to the grid, one has to ask, What's the level of storm intensity that the grid system should be prepared for?
"Based on the data and the scenarios we can reasonably expect, I believe the power-delivery system can operate through a solar storm."
Well, that’s not nearly as exciting as wandering across a wasteland looking for a stray can of beans, but ledes promising a future in dystopic science fiction scenarios should always be taken with a grain of salt. It certainly doesn’t hurt to know about these kinds of events – I remember solar storms creating havoc on my short wave radio – though tamping down the dire predictions would do a world of good.
From NASA: The sun-orbiting SOHO spacecraft has imaged many erupting filaments lifting off the active solar surface and blasting enormous bubbles of magnetic plasma into space. This image shows the sun in ultraviolet light, while the field of view extends over 2 million kilometers, or 1.243 million miles, from the solar surface.

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Editorial Round-Up

April Fools? Maybe not:

Nuclear energy is, for the most part, clean. Though not inexpensive to build, power plants do provide energy at a reasonable cost to consumers for many years.
In remarks made recently during a meeting with national, regional and local news media Ray Golden, TVA’s senior manager of nuclear communication, said, “You cannot abandon use of this fuel.”
Golden is correct. Nuclear energy has to be in the mix as does coal, natural gas, wind and solar energy.
This is from the Scottsboro (Ala.) Daily Sentinel. A little more, explaining the TVA connection:
After meeting with TVA and NRC officials numerous times over the years and recently being involved in a tour at TVA’s oldest nuclear facility I’m [Ken Bonner is the writer] convinced that nuclear power must play a larger role in the future. It must be regulated and icensees diligent in operating and maintaining the plants.
“Our nuclear reactors at TVA have been safely operated for years,” TVA chief nuclear officer Preston Swafford, said.
TVA operates three reactors at Browns Ferry, two at Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant, one at Watts Bar and has a second unit scheduled to come on line at the facility in 2012-2013.
And the conclusion:
Nuclear — it is part of the mix to secure our future. With proper regulations and oversight in place and self-policing policies by the licensees, nuclear power plants can provide energy for the future at minimal risk. I don’t mind it in my backyard.
Just so. 
---
Lake Wylie residents live near the Catawba Nuclear Station, one of three nuclear stations built and operated by Duke Energy. The rising steam billowing from its smoke stacks are always visible south of the Buster Boyd Bridge and siren tests can be heard from the station every month. A few years ago, Duke invited the members of the public to visit the plant and have their questions answered.
There are definite pros for nuclear energy, including little pollution and the ability to generate a high amount of energy from one plant. Cons include disposing of radioactive waste, terrorist and accident risks, operation costs.
A lot of nuclear plant operators are being proactive in reassuring their communities that the plants operate safely. We'll round up a few of these later on, but it was interesting to run into this in an editorial. The Pilot is a bit reassured and realizes that energy generation carries risk:
It seems no matter which way we look for energy resources, there always will be pros and cons. Perhaps energy policy in the U.S. should focus on improving energy efficiency and renewable energy sources. But renewable energy sources still are a long way from being able to provide the quantity of energy our economy requires. In the meantime, nuclear power plants like our Catawba facility are a reality. It is imperative, though, that steps be taken to ensure their safety and reliability.
The conclusion:
The heart of Lake Wylie along S.C. 49 is within a 12-mile distance of this nearest plant. If there should be an accident or malfunction, it would not take much time to be exposed to radioactivity with its devastating health effects.
Er, well, no not really. But The Pilot does a pretty good job overall grappling with the issues for its readers.


Lake Wylie. Wonder what vacation homes go for there?